Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Friday, June 5, 2009

    People are mean.

    As many of you know I work for a call center. Through out my time working on phones (almost four years now.) I have found that the world is full of some very rude people. When I call starts off with "Are you in the Philippines?"/"I don't wanna talk to no people who don't speak English" and so forth I want to reach through the phone and teach them some manners. Or, for example when someone interrupts you time and time again because whatever there saying is more important, even though more often than not there saying they want your help, so when you offer it they talk over you again and demand said help your trying to offer.

    Maybe I'm old fashioned, or maybe I've just worked with the public for to long, but I try really hard to be nice to the people I deal with. The last thing someone needs, is me being a dick to them. And in all honesty, your amount of bullshit directly relates to the amount you get jerked around. Try being nice, it helps I promise.

    Thursday, June 4, 2009

    New Hampshire Legalizes Same-Sex Marriage

    I am very excited to hear this news. The more states that see marriage is a right for all humans the more I think Utah will some day pass a simlar law. I may not ever get married, but I would like to at lest know that if/when I want to, I can. Story below.
    Link to article here.

    June 4, 2009
    By ABBY
    GOODNOUGH

    BOSTON — The New Hampshire legislature approved revisions to a same-sex
    marriage
    bill on Wednesday, and Gov. John
    Lynch
    promptly signed the legislation, making the state the sixth to let gay
    couples wed.
    The bill had been through several permutations to satisfy Mr.
    Lynch and certain legislators that it would not force religious organizations
    that oppose same-sex marriage to participate in ceremonies celebrating it. Some
    groups had feared they could be sued for refusing to allow same-sex weddings on
    their property.
    Mr. Lynch, who previously supported civil unions but not
    marriage for same-sex couples, said in a statement that he had heard “compelling
    arguments that a separate system is not an equal system.”
    “Today,” he said,
    “we are standing up for the liberties of same-sex couples by making clear that
    they will receive the same rights, responsibilities — and respect — under New
    Hampshire law.”
    The law will take effect on Jan. 1. As originally cast, the
    legislation exempted members of the clergy from having to perform same-sex
    weddings. Then Mr. Lynch, a centrist Democrat, said he would veto the bill
    unless the legislature added language also exempting religious groups and their
    employees from having to participate in such ceremonies.
    Mr. Lynch also
    ordered that the bill protect members of religious groups from having to provide
    same-sex couples with religious counseling, housing designated for married
    people and other services relating to “the promotion of marriage.”
    But the
    House rejected that language last month by a two-vote margin, and legislative
    leaders appointed a committee to negotiate a compromise.
    The committee last
    week recommended changes further emphasizing the rights of religious groups not
    to participate. They include a preamble to the bill that states, “Each religious
    organization, association, or society has exclusive control over its own
    religious doctrine, policy, teachings and beliefs regarding who may marry within
    their faith.”
    Republicans have called the committee’s work tainted because
    the Senate president, Sylvia B. Larsen, a Democrat, replaced one of its
    Republican members when that legislator would not sign off on last week’s
    compromise. Under legislative rules, the committee’s decision needed to be
    unanimous.
    As more states have legalized same-sex marriage, opponents have
    increasingly lobbied for “conscience protections,” language that exempts
    religious organizations from having to participate.
    But many of the bill’s
    opponents believe the language adopted by New Hampshire and several other states
    does not go far enough because it protects only religious groups and their
    employees. New Hampshire’s bill does not exempt photographers or florists, for
    example, from having to provide services.
    But groups that advocate for gay
    rights, some of whom poured money into the state in recent months, said the law
    was yet another step toward mainstream America accepting same-sex marriage. “As
    people get to know the loving and committed couples at the heart of marriage
    equality,” said Neil G. Giuliano, president of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance
    Against Defamation, “our culture is moving to equality.”
    Kevin Smith,
    director of the Cornerstone Policy Research, a group opposing the bill, said
    lawmakers “rammed this legislation through” in a way that “reeks of backroom
    deals and a subversion of the legislative process.”

    Wednesday, June 3, 2009

    There is this guy Andres who is friends with a few of the Mythic players, he was at the event on May 20th taking pictures. He hasn't finished editing them all yet, but here are just a few:

    Andrew,Mythic Realms
    This one makes me want to do some sort of anti-smoking ad. "Kids if you smoke you will turn into a giant cat!"

    Mythic Realms

    Kari,Mythic Realms

    Friday, May 29, 2009

    Man who hit and killed dog turns himself in

    The below story makes me a little sick. I would like to see this guy fired and tossed in jail. Laws related to animals are not harsh enough.

    May 29th, 2009 @ 8:37am
    By Ben Winslow
    OGDEN -- Police in Ogden say a man accused of hitting a puppy with his car and dragging its owner by the leash has surrendered.
    The man was identified by the Ogden Police Department late Thursday as Joseph Porter, 45, who is employed as a sergeant at the Weber County Jail.
    Ogden Police Lt. Scott Sangberg told KSL NewsRadio Porter contacted them on Thursday and spoke with investigators about the incident on Gibson Ave.
    "He spoke with detectives who took his statement and some other witness statements," Sangberg said, adding that the statements differ somewhat from what the woman who was dragged claimed.
    Kristan Kap told the Ogden Standard-Examiner she was walking along Gibson Ave. with her 4-month-old puppy on a short leash when the dog was hit by a pickup. She was dragged a short distance because the dog leash was wrapped around her wrist. The driver stopped briefly, then left when confronted by Kap.
    Ogden police said that on Thursday, Porter contacted them. He was not arrested and the case will be referred to city prosecutors to determine if any misdemeanor charges would be leveled against him. Charges could include failure to remain at the scene of an injury accident.
    The Weber County Sheriff's Office told KSL it was still gathering information about the incident and that it would be premature to comment about Porter's status as a jail employee there.
    Kap told the Standard-Examiner she does not want Porter to lose his job over the incident and that she feels "at peace" since he turned himself in.
    E-mail:bwinslow@ksl.com

    Tuesday, May 26, 2009

    California high court upholds same-sex marriage ban
    Story Highlights
    NEW: Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger praises court for leaving 18,000 marriages intact
    Dissenting opinion says decision "fundamentally alters" state constitution
    Court's 6-1 ruling met with chants of "shame on you" from crowd of about 1,000
    Voters in November approved ban on same-sex marriage
    SAN FRANCISCO, California (CNN) -- The California Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a ban on same-sex marriage that state voters passed in November, but it allowed about 18,000 marriages performed before the ban to remain valid.
    The 6-1 decision was met with chants of "shame on you" from a crowd of about 1,000 people who gathered outside the court building in San Francisco.
    "It's nice that my marriage is still intact, but that's not the point," said Kathleen White, who married her partner in 2008. "The point is that everybody should have the same civil rights across the board."
    Opponents of the ban argued that the controversial Proposition 8 improperly altered the California Constitution to restrict a fundamental right guaranteed in the state's charter.
    But the court found the measure restricted the designation of marriage "while not otherwise affecting the fundamental constitutional rights of same-sex couples." Watch what was at stake »
    "We further conclude that Proposition 8 does not apply retroactively and therefore that the marriages of same-sex couples performed prior to the effective date of Proposition 8 remain valid," California Chief Justice Ronald George wrote.
    The court, which is dominated by Republican appointees, ruled in May 2008 that the state constitution guaranteed gay and lesbian couples the "basic civil right" to marry. The 4-3 decision came four years after San Francisco began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
    But in November, state voters approved the Proposition 8 ballot initiative 52 percent to 48 percent. The measure provided that only heterosexual unions would be recognized as marriages by the state.
    California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who opposed the initiative, praised the court for leaving the previous marriages intact and urged opponents of the decision to respond "peacefully and lawfully."
    "While I believe that one day either the people or courts will recognize gay marriage, as governor of California, I will uphold the decision of the California Supreme Court," Schwarzenegger said in a statement.
    Supporters of the proposition argued that Californians long have had the right to change their state constitution through ballot initiatives. The effort to overturn the restriction "strikes directly at the heart of California's system of government," a brief by the conservative Family Research Council argued.
    CaliforniaAttorney General Jerry Brown sided with advocates of same-sex marriage, stating in court papers that Proposition 8 "put the fundamental rights of a minority group to a popular vote." And in his dissenting opinion, Justice Carlos Moreno wrote that the measure "violates the essence of the equal protection clause of the California Constitution and fundamentally alters its scope and meaning."
    "The majority's holding is not just a defeat for same-sex couples, but for any minority group that seeks the protection of the equal protection clause of the California Constitution," Moreno wrote.
    Proposition 8's approval sparked protests against and criticism of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which strongly supported the measure.
    Opponents of the ban said the Utah-based church donated a majority of the money that funded the Proposition 8 campaign. But the Mormons said they were being unfairly singled out for criticism when other religious leaders -- including Cardinal Roger Mahoney, the Roman Catholic archbishop of Los Angeles -- also supported the ban.
    Tuesday's decision left unaddressed whether same-sex marriages performed in other states before the ban was adopted would be recognized in California.
    Four states -- Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts and Iowa -- allow same-sex marriages. A Vermont law making such marriages legal will take effect in September.
    On May 6, same-sex marriage became legal in Maine as Gov. John Baldacci signed a bill less than an hour after the state Legislature approved it.
    In April, the Iowa Supreme Court ruled unanimously that it is illegal to discriminate against same-sex couples by denying them the right to marry. The first gay marriages in the state took place April 27.
    The District of Columbia voted May 5 to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere, though it does not itself give marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
    In April, New York Gov. David Paterson introduced legislation to make same-sex marriage legal in his state.
    New Hampshire's move to legalize same-sex marriage hit a road bump Wednesday after that state's House of Representatives did not agree to legislation changes made by the governor. iReport.com: React to court decision and share photos, video
    Both the House and Senate already had approved allowing gay couples to marry. But Gov. John Lynch, a three-term Democrat, said he would sign a same-sex marriage bill only if it provides "the strongest and clearest protections for religious institutions and associations, and for the individuals working with such institutions."
    The House on Wednesday fell two votes short of approving Lynch's language. The chamber then voted to send the legislation to a committee to be considered further.
    All AboutCaliforniaSame-Sex MarriageConstitutional Law



    Find this article at: http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/05/26/california.same.sex.marriage/index.html


    SAVE THIS EMAIL THIS Close
    Check the box to include the list of links referenced in the article.


    � 2008 Cable News Network
    setTimeout('showLayer();',200);